What happens in China, argues Jonathon Porritt, happens to the rest of the planet. For good, or ill…
Back in June, the Chinese construction minister decreed that all Chinese cities had to re-instate the bike lanes that had been removed over the last few years to make way for the car. All civil servants were told that they must either cycle, or take public transport to get to work - with the minister apparently determined that China should regain its global accolade as “the Kingdom of Bicycles”.
He’ll have quite a struggle on his hands with some of China’s increasingly powerful city mayors, for whom the car has become a far more fitting symbol of economic and political success than the lowly bike. Every day in Beijing, for instance, more than 1,000 new cars are rolled out on its already helplessly congested streets.
That is just one of a seemingly limitless flow of eye-watering statistics about China today. The sheer scale of the place continues to astound the rest of the world. And if your passion in life is sustainable economic development, rather than simply the environment, then what’s going on in China is quite simply the most important unfolding story anywhere in the world.
If 10% of the 60 million people who live in the UK choose to reduce their energy consumption by 1%, it hardly registers as a blip on the world scale. But when 10% of the 1.3 billion people who live in China take advantage of its surging prosperity to increase their own energy consumption by 1% a year (by buying a car, or eating more meat, or getting a larger flat), then the world had better take notice. Such decisions affect us here in the UK as much as our fellow world citizens in China. In an interconnected and interdependent world, China’s emissions are our emissions.
Chinese politicians talk with justifiable pride of their enormous achievement in enabling more than 250 million people to escape grinding rural poverty, and to find jobs in the country’s burgeoning economy. Living standards have soared; and average life expectancy increased from just 35 years when the communists came to power in 1949, to 72 years in 2004.
These social gains have been driven primarily by the economic boom - with average growth of around 10% over the last 15 years. But that has caused environmental damage on such a scale that the entire growth model for China is now imperilled. As Nature reported in 2005: “The losses from pollution and ecological damage range from 7% to 20% of GDP every year in the past two decades.” The impact on human health has been particularly severe. About 300,000 deaths a year are attributed to air quality problems. Sixteen of the world’s 20 most polluted cities are in China, and levels of cancer in such areas are among the worst in the world.
Things are going to get a great deal worse before they get much better. China is building a new coal-fired power station every ten days. In 2005 alone, it added about 65,000 megawatts of new power generation - roughly equivalent to the entire power capacity of the UK today. It is already the world’s second largest emitter of greenhouse gases, and is one of the most inefficient energy users in the world - emissions per unit of GDP are ten times that of the average for developed countries.
There is no point trying to downplay this: there is an ecological apocalypse unfolding in China right now.
But few are more aware of this than the rulers of China themselves. Just a few months ago, the 11th Five Year Plan was unveiled by Premier Wen Jiabao with an exceptionally tough message that China could not follow the old path (which, he might have added, is the path set out by the West) of “grow first, clean up the environmental mess later”. It had to learn to grow sustainably - even if that meant growing more slowly.
The government’s impressive targets for the next five years include a 10% fall in total pollutants (notably sulphur dioxide emissions and chemical oxygen demand), a 20% fall in energy consumption per unit of GDP, and a 30% reduction in water use (per unit of industrial value added). It’s also developing a green accounting system that will include full environmental costs in its calculation of GDP - something that I would dearly love to see working here in the UK.
It is an extraordinary challenge. But China is capable of moving with great speed when it puts its mind to it: it phased out the use of leaded petrol in less than two years (compared to the decade or more it took us here in the UK), and has recently mandated emissions standards for all new cars that are at least the equivalent of European standards.
All of which guarantees an ongoing battle royal between those who see the glass as half empty, and those who see it as half full. The ‘half-empties’ look at the existing environmental legacy, factor that into the huge political and social pressures to keep the Chinese economy booming at almost any cost, and remain sunk in impenetrable gloom.
The ‘half-fulls’ see no reason why China shouldn’t become the world’s number one nation in terms of eco-efficiency and the kind of “green industrial revolution” that Western leaders love to pontificate about. But they acknowledge that achieving this will take a lot more than some ministerial decree restoring the bike to its rightful place in the hierarchy of sustainable transport systems - however welcome that may be!
“China’s economic miracle will end soon because the environment can no longer keep pace. Five of the ten most polluted cities worldwide are in China; acid rain is falling on one third of our territory; half of the water in China’s seven largest rivers is completely useless; a quarter of our citizens lack access to clean drinking water; a third of the urban population is breathing polluted air; less than a fifth of the rubbish in cities is treated and processed in an environmentally sustainable manner.” - Pan Yue, Chinese deputy environment minister
Jonathon Porritt is Founder Director of Forum for the Future and Chair of the UK Sustainable Development Commission.
2 November 2006